Why is there a page on vaccines on a website like this? Well what you may not know is that the MMR [Measles, Mumps, Rubella] Vaccine and the Varicella [chickenpox] vaccine are both propagated [grown] on tissue derived from aborted babies. The cells are called "human diploid cells". Also a few less known vaccines such as the ones on the following list also use these "human diploid cells".
Biavax [Rubella and Mumps]--Merck and Co.
ImoVax [Rabies] -- Connaught Laboratories
Havrix [Hepatitis A]--SmithKline Beecham
Meruvax II [Rubella]--Merck and Co.
M-R Vax [Measles and Rubella] -- Merck and Co.
Varicella Virus [Chicken Pox Vaccine]-- Varivax Co.
This of course makes some vaccines a moral issue for the Christian. What about the other vaccines that do not contain human diploid cells? They all contain toxins and chemicals that have been proven to have negative effect on our children's brain development and immune systems. Which leads us to the question we all want to know; when thinking of vaccinating our children, are vaccinated children less vulnerable to these diseases and more healthy than non-vaccinated children? This page will be updated periodically with information, videos and articles that answer this question and provide behind the scenes information that is vital to you making the right choice for your family.
Here is a summary of why vaccines are a violation to the Christian faith.
This is by no means exhaustive and could be added to.
Vaccines and the Bible
Vaccines are made in violation of Gods Word. Vaccines are mad with toxic chemicals that are injected into the bloodstream by vaccination. All vaccines are made with foreign proteins (Viruses and Bacteria) and some vaccines are made with genetically engineered viral and bacterial materials.
A conflict arises if you believe that man is made in God's image and the injection of toxic chemicals and foreign proteins in to the bloodstream is a violation of God's directive to keep the body/temple holy and free form impurities.
A conflict arises if you accept God's warning not to mix the blood of man with the blood of animals. Many vaccines are produced in animal tissues.
A conflict arises if your religious convictions are predicated on the belief that all life is sacred. God's commandment "Thou Shall Not Kill" applies to the practice of abortion. When you believe that the practice of abortion should not be encouraged or supported in any way, a conflict arises with the use of vaccines produced in the aborted fetal tissue even though you did not have any other connection with the abortions from which the vaccines are derived.
Q: What religions qualify for religious exemption?
The statutory language for Florida vaccine policy clearly states that religious exemption must be granted without question if vaccination conflicts with a person's religious convictions. A religious objection may be expressly implied by religious denomination or it may be based on an individual's own moral spiritual conscience to live God's word.
Agents acting on behalf of the state in vaccination matters are prohibited from requesting ANY administrative proof that explains the recipient's religious belief or that proves membership in an "acceptable" or specific religion. The state may NOT discriminate between religious denominations and may NOT make judgments regarding religious convictions.
Q: What specific scriptural teachings form the basis for religious objection to the practice of vaccination?
The New Testament epistles provide an exposition of Christian teaching regarding ethical behavior. Christians think of life as a gift of God and the body as a marvelous work of divine creation to be reverenced as a temple of God (1 Corinthians 3:16, 6:19). To keep the body/temple holy and clean from blemish scripture warns against defiling the body. (1 Corinthians 3:17, 2 Corinthians 7:1).
There is no scriptural support for injecting poisons or any virus in to the bloodstream to cure or prevent disease. The old and New Testament however are replete with references to keeping the body blemish-free so that we may have abundant life.
Download this pdf for a complete list of all vaccine ingredients. This comes from the CDC website.
CDC Vaccine ingredient list..pdf Size : 147.197 Kb Type : pdf |
|
Why You Should Avoid Taking Vaccines
by DR. JAMES HOWENSTINE, MD (WORLD VISION PORTAL)
Cowpox vaccine was believed able to immunize people against smallpox. At the
time this vaccine was introduced, there was already a decline in the number of
cases of smallpox.
Japan introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872. In 1892 there were 165,774
cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination program. A
stringent compulsory smallpox vaccine program, which prosecuted those refusing
the vaccine, was instituted in England in 1867.
Within 4 years 97.5 % of persons between 2 and 50 had been vaccinated. The following
year England experienced the worst smallpox epidemic[1] in its history with
44,840 deaths. Between 1871 and 1880 the incidence of smallpox escalated from
28 to 46 per 100,000. The smallpox vaccine does not work.
Much of the success attributed to vaccination programs may actually have been
due to improvement in public health related to water quality and sanitation, less crowded
living conditions, better nutrition, and higher standards of living.
disease was clearly declining before the vaccine for that disease was introduced. In England the
incidence of polio had decreased by 82 % before the polio vaccine was
introduced in 1956.
In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated
"Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox
vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of
cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an un-vaccinated [2] person."
There is a widely held belief that vaccines should not be criticized because
the public might refuse to take them. This is valid only if the benefits exceed
the known risks of the vaccines.
Do Vaccines Actually Prevent Disease?
This important question does not appear to have ever been adequately studied.
Vaccines are enormously profitable for drug companies and recent legislation in
the U.S. has exempted lawsuits against pharmaceutical firms in the event of
adverse reactions to vaccines which are very common. In 1975 Germany stopped
requiring pertussis (whooping cough) vaccination. Today less than 10 % of
German children are vaccinated against pertussis. The number of cases of
pertussis has steadily decreased[3] even though far fewer children are
receiving pertussis vaccine.
Measles outbreaks have occurred in schools with vaccination rates over 98 % in
all parts of the U.S. including areas that had reported no cases of measles for
years. As measles immunization rates rise to high levels measles becomes a disease seen only in vaccinated persons. An
outbreak of measles occurred in a school where 100 % of the children had been
vaccinated. Measles mortality rates had declined by 97 % in England before
measles vaccination was instituted.
In 1986 there were 1300 cases of pertussis in Kansas and 90 % of these cases
occurred in children who had been adequately vaccinated. Similar vaccine
failures have been reported from Nova Scotia where pertussis continues to be
occurring despite universal vaccination. Pertussis remains endemic[4] in the
Netherlands where for more than 20 years 96 % of children have received 3
pertussis shots by age 12 months.
After institution of diphtheria vaccination in England and Wales in 1894 the
number of deaths from diphtheria rose by 20 % in the subsequent 15 years.
Germany had compulsory vaccination in 1939. The rate of diphtheria spiraled to
150,000 cases that year whereas, Norway which did not have compulsory
vaccination, had only 50 cases of diphtheria the same year.
The continued presence of these infectious diseases in
children who have received vaccines proves that life long immunity which
follows natural infection does not occur in persons receiving vaccines. The
injection process places the viral particles into the blood without providing
any clear way to eliminate these foreign substances.
Why Do Vaccines Fail To Protect Against Diseases?
Walene James, author of Immunization: the Reality Behind The Myth, states that
the full[5] inflammatory response is necessary to create real immunity. Prior to the
introduction of measles and mumps vaccines children got measles and mumps and
in the great majority of cases these diseases were benign. Vaccines
"trick" the body so it does not mount a complete inflammatory response
to the injected virus.
Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome SIDS
The incidence of Sudden Infant Death syndrome SIDS has grown from .55 per 1000
live births in 1953 to 12.8 per 1000 in 1992 in Olmstead County, Minnesota. The
peak incidence for SIDS is age 2 to 4 months the exact time most vaccines are
being given to children. 85 % of cases of SIDS occur in the first 6 months of
infancy. The increase in SIDS as a percentage of total infant deaths has risen
from 2.5 per 1000 in 1953 to 17.9 per 1000 in 1992. This rise in SIDS deaths
has occurred during a period when nearly every childhood disease was declining due to improved
sanitation and medical progress except SIDS. These deaths from SIDS
did increase during a period when the number of vaccines given a child was
steadily rising to 36 per child.
Dr. W. Torch was able to document 12
deaths in infants which appeared within 3½ and 19 hours of a DPT immunization.
He later reported 11 new cases of SIDS death and one near miss which had
occurred within 24 hours of a DPT injection. When he studied 70 cases of SIDS
two thirds of these victims[6] had been vaccinated from one half day to 3 weeks
prior to their deaths. None of these deaths was attributed to vaccines.
Vaccines are a sacred cow and nothing against them appears in the mass media
because they are so profitable to pharmaceutical firms.
There is valid reason to think that not only are vaccines worthless in
preventing disease they are counterproductive because
they injure the immune system permitting cancer, auto-immune diseases and SIDS to cause much disability and
death.
Are Vaccines Sterile?
Dr. Robert Strecker claimed that the department of defense DOD was given
$10,000,000 in 1969 to create the AIDS virus to be used as a
population-reducing[7] weapon against blacks. By use of the Freedom of
Information Act Dr. Strecker was able to learn that the DOD secured funds from
Congress to perform studies on immune destroying agents for germ warfare.
Once produced, the vaccine was given in two locations. Smallpox vaccine containing HIV was given to
100,000,000 Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young white homosexual males in New York City were given Hepatitis B vaccine that
contained HIV
virus in 1978. This
vaccine was given at New York
City Blood Center. The Hepatitis
B vaccine containing the HIV
virus was also administered to
homosexual males in San Francisco, Los Angeles, St.Louis, Houston and Chicago
in 1978 and 1979. U.S. Public Health epidemiology studies have disclosed that
these same 6 cities had the highest incidence of AIDS, Aids related Complex
(ARC) and deaths rates from HIV, when compared to other U.S. cities.
When a new virus is introduced into a community. It takes 20 years for the
number of cases to double. If the fabricated story that green monkey bites of
pygmies led to the HIV epidemic, the alleged monkey bites in the 1940s should
have produced a peak in the incidence of HIV in the 1960s at which time HIV was
non existent in Africa. The World Health Organization (WHO)
began a African smallpox vaccination campaign in 1977 that targeted urban
population centers and avoided pygmies. If the green monkey bites of pygmies
truly caused the HIV epidemic the incidence of HIV in pygmies should have been
higher than in urban citizens. However, the opposite was true.
In 1954 Dr. Bernice Eddy (bacteriologist) discovered live monkey viruses in
supposedly sterile inactivated polio vaccine[8] developed by Dr. Jonas Salk.
This discovery was not well received at the NIH and Dr. Eddy was demoted. Later
Dr. Eddy, working with Sarah Stewart, discovered SE polyoma virus. This virus
was quite important because it caused cancer in every animal receiving it.
Yellow fever vaccine had previously been found to contain avian (bird) leukemia
virus. Later Dr. Hilleman isolated SV 40 virus from both the Salk and Sabin
polio vaccines. There were 40 different viruses[9] in these polio vaccines they
were trying to eradicate. They were never able to get rid of these viruses
ontaminating the polio vaccines. The SV 40 virus causes malignancies. It has
now been identified in 43 % of cases of non-Hodgekin lymphoma[10] , 36 % of
brain tumors[11] , 18 % of healthy blood samples, and 22 % of healthy semen
samples, mesothiolomas and other malignancies. By the time of this discovery SV
40 had already been injected into 10,000,000 people in Salk vaccine. Gastric
digestion inactivtes some of SV 40 in Sabin vaccine. However, the isolation of
strains of Sabin polio vaccine from all 38 cases of Guillan Barre Syndrome[12]
GBS in Brazil suggests that significant numbers of persons are able to be
infected from this vaccine. All 38 of these patients had received Sabin polio
vaccine months to years before the onset of GBS. The incidence of non-Hodgekin
lymphoma has"mysteriouly" doubled since the 1970s.
Dr. John Martin, Professor of Pathology at the Univ. of Southern California,
was employed by the Viral Oncology Branch of the Bureau of Biologics (FDA) from
1976 to 1980. While employed there he identified foreign DNA in the live polio
vaccine Orimune Lederle that suggested serious vaccine contamination. He warned
his supervisors about this problem and was told to discontinue his work as it
was outside the scope of testing required for polio vaccine.
Later Dr. Martin learned that all eleven of the African green monkeys used to
grow the Lederle polio virus Orimune had grown simian cytomegalovirus from
kidney cell cultures. Lederle was aware of this viral contamination as their
Cytomegaloviral Contamination Plan[13] clearly showed in 1972. The Bureau of
Biologics decided not to pursue the matter so production of infected polio
vaccine continued.
In 1955 Dr. Martin identified unique cell destroying viruses termed stealth
viruses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. These viruses lacked genes
that would enable the immune system to recognize them. Thus they were protected
by the body's failure to develop antiviral antibodies. In March of 1995, Dr.
Martin learned that some of these stealth viruses had originated from African
green monkey simian cytomegalovirus of a type known to infect man.
The Lederle vaccine experience suggests that the higher-ups are not concerned
about sloppy and dangerous preparation of vaccines. Animal cross infection is a
huge unsolved current problem for all vaccine manufacturing. If this vaccine
production sounds like an unbelievable mess to you, you are right.
The influential Club of Rome has a position paper in which they state that the
world population is too large and needs to be reduced by 90 %. This means that
6 billion people must be reduced to 500 to 600 million. Obviously, creating
famines and genocidal wars such as wrecked havoc in Africa, and loosing new
laboratory-created diseases (HIV, Ebola, Marburg[14] , and probably West Nile
virus and SARS) can help reduce the population. Other elitist groups
(Trilaterals, Bildenbergers) have expressed similar concerns about excess
people on planet Earth.
The company that was projected to produce the new smallpox vaccine in the U.S.
was in serious trouble in England because of unsatisfactory quality of
operations before setting up their facility in the U.S. Why would their
performance here be any better than it was in England?
If there are important powerful groups of people that are determined to reduce
the world population, what could be a more diabolically clever way to eliminate
people than to inject them with a cancer-causing vaccine? The person receiving
the injection would never suspect that the vaccine taken 10 to 15 years earlier
had caused the cancer to appear.
Other Dangers From Vaccines
In the March 4, 1977 issue of Science Jonas and Darrell Salk warn, "Live
virus vaccines against influenza or poliomyelitis may in each instance produce
the disease it intended to prevent. The live virus against measles and mumps
may produce such side effects as encephalitis (brain damage).
The swine flu vaccine was administered to the American public even though there
had never been a case of swine flu identified in a human. Farmers refused to
use the vaccine because it killed too many animals. Within a few months of use
in humans this vaccine caused many cases of serious nerve injury (Guillan Barre
syndrome).
An article in the Washington Post on Jan. 26, 1988 mentioned that all cases of
polio since 1979 had been caused by the polio vaccine with no known cases of
polio from a wild strain since 1979. This might have created a perfect
situation to discontinue the vaccine, but the vaccine is still given. Vaccines
are a wonderful source of profits with no risks to the drug companies since
vaccine injuries are now recompensed by the government.
The steady escalation in the number of vaccines administered has been followed
by an identical rise in the incidence of auto-immune diseases (rheumatoid
arthritis, subacute lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, asthma)
seen in children. While there is a genetic transmission of some of these
diseases many are probably due to the injury from foreign protein particles,
mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and other toxic agents injected in vaccines.
In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was recommended by the Center for Disease
Control for all infants. When this vaccine program was instituted several
infants died and many had life endangering bowel obstructions. Prelicensure
trials[15] of the rotavirus vaccine had demonstrated an increased incidence of
intussusception 30 times greater than normal but the vaccine was released
anyway without special warnings to practitioners to be on the lookout for bowel
problems. Children's vaccines are often not studied for toxicity possibly
because such study might eliminate them from being used.
A large study from Australia showed that the risk of developing encephalitis
from the pertussis vaccine was 5 times greater than the risk of developing
encephalitis by contacting pertussis by natural methods.
Naturally acquired immunity by illness evolves by spread of a virus from the
respiratory tract to the liver, thymus, spleen, and bone marrow. When symptoms
begin, the entire immune response has been mobilized to repel the invading
virus. This complex immune system response creates antibodies that confer life
long immunity against that invading virus and prepares the child to respond
promptly to an infection by the same virus in the future.
Vaccination, in contrast, results in the persisting of live virus or other
foreign antigens within the cells of the body, a situation that may provoke
auto-immune reactions as the body attempts to destroy its own infected cells.
There is no surprise that the incidence of auto-immune diseases (rheumatoid
arthritis, subacute lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, asthma, psoriasis)
has risen sharply in this era of multiple vaccine immunization.
Vaccine Induced Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Dr. John Classen has published 29 articles on vaccine-induced[16] diabetes. At
least 8 of 10 children with Type 1 (insulin needing) diabetes have this disease
as a result of vaccination. These children may have avoided measles, mumps, and
whooping cough but they have received something far worse: an illness that
shortens life expectancy by 10 to 15 years and results in a life requiring
constant medical care.
Dr. Classen has shown in Finland, the introduction of hemophilus type b vaccine
caused three times as many cases of type 1 diabetes as the number of deaths and
brain damage from hemophilus influenza type b it might have prevented.
In New Zealand, the incidence of Type 1 diabetes in children rose by 61 % after
an aggressive vaccine program against hepatitis B.. This same program has been
started in the U.S.A. so we can now look forward to many cases of Type 1
diabetes in children. Similar rises in Type 1 diabetes have been seen in
England, Italy, Sweden, and Denmark after immunization programs against
Hepatitis B.
Toxic Substances Are Needed To Make Vaccines.
Vaccines contain many toxic substances that are needed to prevent the vaccines
from becoming infected or to improve the performance of the vaccine. Among
these substances are mercury, formaldehyde and aluminum.[17]
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen from between
200 and 500 percent in every state in the U.S. This sharp rise in autism
followed the introduction of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in 1975.
Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9
diseases in one day. These injections were instantly followed by autism. These
injections contain a preservative of mercury called thimerosal. The boy
received 41 times the amount of mercury which is capable of harm to the body.
Mercury is a neurotoxin that can injure the brain and nervous system. And
tragically, it did.
In the United States the number of compulsory vaccine injections has increased
from 10 to 36 in the last 25 years. During this period, there has been a
simultaneous increase in the number of children suffering learning disabilities
and attention deficit disorder. Some of these childhood disabilities are
related to intrauterine cerebral damage from maternal cocaine use, but probably
vaccines cause many of the others.
Many vaccines contain aluminum. A new disease called macrophagic myofasciitis
causes pain in muscles, bones and joints. All persons with this disease have
received aluminum containing vaccines. Deposits of aluminum are able to remain
as an irritant in tissues and disturb the immune and nervous system for a
lifetime.
Nearly all vaccines contain aluminum and mercury. These metals appear to play
an important role in the etiology of Alzheimer's Disease. An expert at the 1997
International Vaccine Conference related that a person who takes 5 or more
annual flu vaccine shots has increased the likelihood of developing Alzheimer's
Disease by a factor of 10 over the person who has had 2 or fewer flu shots.
When we take vaccines we are playing a modern version of Russian Roulette. We
not only get exposed to aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde and foreign cell
proteins but we may get simian virus 40 and other dangerous viruses which can
cause cancer, leukemia and other severe health problems because the vaccine
pool is contaminated due to careless animal isolation techniques. Congress has
protected the manufacturers from lawsuits, so dangerous vaccines simply
increase profits at no risk to the drug companies.
U.S. children aged 2 months began receiving hepatitis B vaccine in December 2000.No
peer-reviewed studies of the safety of hepatitis B in this age bracket had been
done. Over 36,000 adverse reactions with 440 deaths were soon reported but the
true incidence is much higher as reporting is voluntary so only approximately
10 % of adverse reactions get reported. This means that about 5000 infants are
dying annually from the hepatitis B vaccine. The CDC's Chief of Epidemiology
admits that the frequency of serious reactions to hepatitis B vaccine is 10
times higher than other vaccines. Hepatitis B is transmitted sexually and by
contaminated blood, so the incidence of this disease must be near zero in this
age bracket. A vaccine expert, Dr. Philip Incao, states that "the
conclusion is obvious that the risks[18] of hepatitis B vaccination far
outweigh the benefits. Once a vaccine is mandated the vaccine manufacturer is
no longer liable for adverse reactions.
Dr. W.B. Clarke's important observation that cancer was not found in
unvaccinated individuals demands an explanation and one now appears
forthcoming. All vaccines given over a short period of time to an immature
immune system deplete the thymus gland (the primary gland involved in immune
reactions) of irreplaceable immature immune cells. Each of these cells could
have multiplied and developed into an army of valuable cells to combat
infection and growth of abnormal cells. When these immune cells have been used
up, permanent immunity may not appear. The Arthur Research Foundation in
Tucson, Arizona estimates that up to 60 % of our immune system may be
exhausted[19] by multiple mass vaccines (36 are now required for children).
Only 10 % of immune cells are permanently lost when a child is permitted to
develop natural immunity from disease. There needs to be grave concern about
these immune system injuring vaccinations! Could the persons who approve these
mass vaccinations know that they are impairing the health of these children,
many of whom are being doomed to requiring much medical care in the future?
Compelling evidence is available that the development of the immune system
after contracting the usual childhood diseases matures and renders it capable
to fight infection and malignant cells in the future.
The use of multiple vaccines, which prevents natural immunity, promotes the
development of allergies and asthma. A New Zealand study disclosed that 23 % of
vaccinated children develop asthma , as compared to zero in unvaccinated
children.
Cancer was a very rare illness in the 1890's. This evidence about immune system
injury from vaccinating affords a plausible explanation for Dr. Clarke's
finding that only vaccinated individuals got cancer. Some radical adverse
change in health occurred in the early 1900s to permit cancer to explode and
vaccinating appears to be the reason.
Vaccines are an unnatural phenomena. My guess is that if enough persons said no
to immunizations there would be a striking improvement in general health with
nature back in the immunizing business instead of man. Having a child
vaccinated should be a choice not a requirement. Medical and religious
exemptions are permitted by most states.
When governmental policies require vaccinations before children enter schools
coercion has overruled the lack of evidence of vaccine efficacy and safety.
There is no proof that vaccines work and they are never studied for safety
before release. My opinion is that there is overwhelming evidence that vaccines
are dangerous and the only reason for their existence is to increase profits of
pharmaceutical firms.
If you are forced to immunize your children so they can enter school, obtain a
notarized statement from the director of the facility that they will accept
full financial responsibility for any adverse reaction from the vaccine. Since
there is at least a 2 percent risk of a serious adverse reaction they may be
smart enough to permit your child to escape a dangerous procedure. Recent
legislation passed by Congress gives the government the power to imprison
persons refusing to take vaccines (smallpox, anthrax, etc). This would be
troublesome to enforce if large numbers of citizens declined to be vaccinated
at the same time.
Footnotes:
1 Null Gary Vaccination: An Analysis of the Health Risks- Part Townsend Letter
for Doctors & Patients Dec. 2003 pg 78
2 Mullins Eustace Murder by Injection pg 132 The National Council for Medical
Research, P. O. Box 1105, Staunton, Virginia 24401
3 Gary Null Interview with Dr. Dean Black April 7, 1995
4 de Melker HE, et al Pertussis in the Netherlands: an outbreak despite high
levels of immunization with whole-cell vaccine Emerging Infectious Diseases
1997; 3(2): 175-8 Centers for Disease Control
5 Gary Null Interview with Walene James, April 6, 1995
6 Torch WS Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunizations: a potential cause
of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) Neurology 1982; 32-4 A169 abstract.
7 Collin Jonathan The Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients 1988
abstracted in Horowitz L. Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola pg 1-5
8 Harris RJ et al Contaminant viruses in two live vaccines produced in chick
cells.J Hyg (London) 1966 Mar:64(1) : 1-7
9 Horowitz Leonard G. Emerging Viruses AIDS & Ebola pg 484
10 Vilchez RA et al Association between simian virus 40 and non-Hodgekin
lymphoma Lancet 2002 Mar 9;359(9309):817-823
11 Bu X A study of simian virus 40 infection and its origin in human brain
tumors Zhonghu Liu Xing Bing Xue Zhi 2000 Feb;21 (1):19-21
12 Friedrich F. et al temporal association between the isolation of
Sabin-related poliovirus vaccine strains and the Guillan-Barre syndrome Rev
Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1996 Jan-Feb; 38(1):55-8
13 Horowitz Leonard Emerging Viruses: Aids and Ebola pg 492
14 Horowitz Leonard G Emerging Viruses: Aids & Ebola pg 378-88 Tetrahedron
Inc. Suite 147, 206 North 4th Ave. Sandpoint, Idaho 83864 1-888-508-4787
tetra@tetrahedron.org
15 Null, Gary Vaccination: An Anatysis of the health risks-Part 3 Townsend
letter for doctors & patients Dec. 2003 pg 78
16 Classen, JB et al. Association between type 1 diabetes and Hib vaccine BMJ
1999; 319:1133
17 Brain 9/01
18 Incao, philip M.D. Letter to representative Dale Van Vyven, Ohio House of
Representatives March 1, 1999 provided to www.garynull.com by The Natural
Immunity Information Network
19 Rowen Robert Your first consultation with Dr. Rowen pg 20
(c) 2003 Dr. James Howenstine - All Rights Reserved
*** Dr. James A. Howenstine is a board certified specialist in internal
medicine who spent 34 years caring for office and hospital patients. Curiosity
sparked a 4 year study of natural health products when 5 of his patients with
severe rheumatoid arthritis were able to discontinue the use of methotrexate
(chemotherapy agent) after trying an extract of New Zealand mussels for the
therapy of severe rheumatoid arthritis.
Dr. Howenstine is convinced that natural products are safer, more effective and
less expensive than pharmaceutical drugs. This research led to the publication
of his book 'A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work'. This
book and the recommended health products are available from
www.naturalhealthteam.com
ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED
http://worldvisionportal.org/wvpforum/viewtopic.php?t=621